Customer De-escalation Training
Customer De-escalation Training
Manager Role and SOP Expectations
0/3 activities done
Recognizing Escalation Signals
0/3 activities done
Safe and Professional Response Standards
0/3 activities done
Manager Role and SOP Expectations
0/0 activities done
Recognizing Escalation Signals
0/0 activities done
Safe and Professional Response Standards
0/0 activities done
Identifying Problem Customer Types
0/3 activities done
Calming a Rising Disagreement
0/3 activities done
Coaching Sales Representatives
0/3 activities done
Setting Boundaries Respectfully
0/3 activities done
Identifying Problem Customer Types
0/0 activities done
Calming a Rising Disagreement
0/0 activities done
Coaching Sales Representatives
0/0 activities done
Setting Boundaries Respectfully
0/0 activities done
Return Policy Exception Review
0/3 activities done
Explaining Denials and Alternatives
0/3 activities done
Alternative approaches to Customer Considerations
Knowledge Check
Using Star Rewards Appropriately
0/3 activities done
Documenting Sensitive Outcomes
0/3 activities done
Explaining Denials and Alternatives
0/3 activities done
Alternative approaches to Customer Considerations
Knowledge Check
Using Star Rewards Appropriately
0/3 activities done
Documenting Sensitive Outcomes
0/3 activities done
Customer De-escalation Training
Course: Returns, Exceptions, and Star Rewards
Module: Using Star Rewards Appropriately
Activity: Using Star Rewards Program Points
Purpose of Star Rewards
- Recognize Macy’s colleagues whose performance, service, teamwork, leadership, or contributions demonstrate company values.
- Highlight actions that exceed normal job expectations.
- Support consistent, respectful recognition decisions.
When Star Rewards May Be Appropriate
- A colleague provides outstanding customer service during a difficult return or exception.
- A colleague helps de-escalate a customer concern professionally and respectfully.
- A colleague’s actions support customers, colleagues, business objectives, or Macy’s values.
- The contribution is specific, documented, and exceeds routine responsibilities.
Reviewer Questions
- Is the nominee eligible?
- Is the selected award category appropriate?
- Does the nomination describe a specific accomplishment?
- Did the contribution exceed routine job expectations?
- Are the facts complete, clear, and understandable?
- Is the requested award level supported by the contribution?
- Is any additional information or approval required?
- Is the nomination written professionally and respectfully?
Approval Guidelines
- Approve only when the nomination is complete, accurate, eligible, and supported.
- Verify nominee and nominator information.
- Confirm the award category and recognition level are appropriate.
- Review required documentation and approvals.
- Add a brief reviewer comment when required.
Sample Approval Comment
“Approved. The nomination provides a specific example of outstanding customer service and clearly demonstrates how the colleague exceeded normal performance expectations.”
When to Return for Correction
- Required fields are incomplete.
- Employee identifying information is incorrect.
- The award category may not match the accomplishment.
- The nomination lacks a specific example.
- The description is too general to support a decision.
- Supporting documentation or required approval is missing.
- The award level needs additional justification.
Sample Return Message
“Thank you for submitting this nomination. Please provide a specific example of the colleague’s contribution, including what occurred, the actions taken, and the result achieved.”
Activity: Using Star Rewards Program Points
Review each scenario and decide whether the nomination should be approved or returned for correction.
- Does the nomination include a clear customer de-escalation example?
- Does it describe the colleague’s specific actions?
- Does it explain the result for the customer, team, or business?
- Does it support the requested award level?
Key Reminder
- Star Rewards should recognize specific, eligible, and well-supported contributions.
- Do not use points to bypass policy, change award values, or ignore approval requirements.
- Keep nomination information within the authorized review process.
- Explain decisions clearly and respectfully.